The integration of Artificial Intelligence into Human Resources (HR) practices across Europe is rapidly transforming the operational landscape, presenting both unprecedented opportunities and complex regulatory challenges. AI’s potential to revolutionize HR functions—from automating recruitment processes and enhancing performance management to personalizing employee development and improving operational efficiency—is undeniable. However, this rapid adoption necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the intricate regulatory framework governing AI, ensuring compliance and ethical implementation.
For European HR professionals, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the forthcoming European AI Act are of paramount importance. The GDPR, in effect since 2018, establishes stringent rules for processing personal data, including that of employees and job applicants. The AI Act, with its phased implementation commencing in February 2025, introduces a specific regulatory layer targeting AI systems based on their potential risk. Given that AI applications in HR frequently involve processing personal data and often fall under the ‘high-risk’ classification of the AI Act, HR managers must carefully navigate the interplay between these two regulations.
This blog post provides a comprehensive guide for European HR managers, focusing on decoding the AI Act, ensuring GDPR compliance in the context of AI, understanding the growth and potential of AI in HR, identifying strategic investments, navigating inherent challenges and risks, and outlining best practices for responsible AI adoption.
Decoding the European AI Act for HR Applications
The European AI Act adopts a risk-based approach to regulate artificial intelligence, classifying AI systems based on their potential to cause harm. This hierarchical classification system—ranging from unacceptable risk to minimal or no risk—directly dictates the level of regulatory scrutiny and specific obligations applicable to both providers and deployers of these systems, such as HR departments. Understanding this risk-based framework is fundamental for HR managers as they evaluate and implement various AI tools.
The AI Act categorizes AI systems into four main risk levels, each with distinct implications for HR:
Prohibited AI Systems
At the highest level are prohibited AI systems, deemed to pose unacceptable risks to fundamental rights and are therefore banned. For HR, this category includes AI systems used for social scoring of employees or candidates based on their social behavior or unrelated personal characteristics. Furthermore, the Act prohibits AI systems designed to infer emotions in the workplace, with very limited exceptions for medical or safety purposes.
This prohibition has significant ramifications for HR tools that might analyze facial expressions, voice patterns, or even keystrokes to gauge emotions for purposes such as assessing candidate suitability or monitoring employee engagement. HR managers must be particularly vigilant to avoid deploying any AI technologies that fall under these prohibited practices, as doing so can lead to substantial penalties.
High-Risk AI Systems
Next in the risk hierarchy are high-risk AI systems. Notably, the AI Act specifically classifies AI systems intended for use in the context of employment and workers’ management as high-risk. This includes AI systems designed for recruitment or selection processes, for making decisions that affect work-related relationships such as promotion or termination, for allocating tasks based on individual behavior or personal traits, and for monitoring and evaluating employee performance. Given that these functions are central to HR operations, most AI applications in these areas will likely be considered high-risk, thereby triggering a set of stringent compliance obligations.
Limited-Risk AI Systems
AI systems falling under the category of limited risk are subject to specific transparency requirements. A prime example relevant to HR is using chatbots for handling HR inquiries. In such cases, the AI Act mandates that users must be clearly informed that they are interacting with an AI system. This ensures transparency and allows individuals to understand the nature of their interaction.
Minimal or No-Risk AI Systems
Finally, minimal or no-risk AI systems, such as spam filters or AI-powered video games, are generally subject to no specific regulatory requirements under the AI Act due to their minimal potential to infringe on fundamental rights.
Obligations for High-Risk AI Systems in HR
For HR departments deploying AI systems classified as high-risk, the AI Act imposes a comprehensive set of obligations:
- Risk Management System: Establishing and maintaining a robust risk management system throughout the AI system’s lifecycle.
- Data Quality: Ensuring that the data used to train the AI system is of high quality, relevant, and sufficiently representative to prevent discriminatory outcomes.
- Technical Documentation: Maintaining comprehensive technical documentation of the AI system, detailing its functionalities and compliance with the Act.
- Transparency: Informing candidates and employees about using a high-risk AI system, explaining how it functions and how decisions will be made.
- Human Oversight: Mandating appropriate human oversight over the operation of high-risk AI systems to ensure fairness and accuracy in decision-making.
- Logging: Logging the uses of the AI system, the data processed, and instances of employee recognition by the system.
- EU Database Registration: Registering high-risk AI systems in an EU database.
- Conformity Assessments: Undergoing conformity assessments to demonstrate compliance before placing them on the market or putting them into service.
- Continuous Monitoring: Continuously monitoring the AI system’s operation to identify any emerging risks.
- Robustness and Accuracy: Designing the system to be sufficiently robust and accurate for its intended purpose.
The breadth and depth of these obligations underscore the significant investment in processes and technologies that HR departments will need to make to ensure compliance when using high-risk AI in their operations.
Prohibited Practices in the Workplace
Beyond the obligations for high-risk systems, the AI Act also has direct implications for practices that are outright prohibited in the workplace. As previously mentioned, emotion recognition systems that infer emotions based on biometric data in the workplace are largely forbidden. This prohibition extends to analyzing facial expressions, voice patterns, or other biometric data to detect emotions like stress, satisfaction, or engagement. Similarly, using AI for social scoring of employees or candidates based on their social behavior or characteristics that are not directly relevant to their job performance is prohibited. HR managers must also be aware of the prohibition on employing manipulative or deceptive AI techniques that could distort an individual’s behavior without their awareness. Proactive identification and elimination of any existing or planned AI applications that fall into these prohibited categories are crucial to avoid severe legal and financial repercussions.
Transparency, Documentation, and Human Oversight
Transparency, documentation, and human oversight are cross-cutting requirements under the AI Act that are particularly relevant for HR applications. HR departments must ensure transparency by thoroughly documenting their AI processes and making relevant information accessible to employees. Maintaining detailed records of all compliance efforts related to the AI Act is also essential. Furthermore, implementing robust mechanisms for human review and intervention in decisions that are informed or made by AI systems is critical. These requirements underscore the legislative intent to ensure that AI in HR is explainable and that human professionals retain control over significant decisions affecting individuals’ careers.
AI Literacy
Finally, the AI Act places a significant emphasis on the importance of AI literacy within organizations. Employers are obligated to ensure that HR staff members and other personnel who will be dealing with the operation and use of AI systems possess a sufficient level of AI literacy tailored to their specific roles and the context in which the AI system is used. This necessitates the implementation of comprehensive AI Act training programs to equip HR professionals with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and oversee AI systems and to understand the legal and ethical implications of their use.
GDPR Compliance in the Age of AI-Driven HR
Even before the advent of the AI Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) established a comprehensive framework for processing personal data within the European Union. These core GDPR principles remain highly relevant and directly applicable to using AI in HR, forming a crucial foundation for compliant implementation.
Principles such as lawfulness, fairness, and transparency dictate that any processing of personal data by AI systems must have a legitimate legal basis, be conducted fairly, and be transparent to the individuals whose data is being processed. This includes providing clear information about how AI systems are used and the purposes for which employee data is processed. The principle of data minimization requires that HR departments only collect and process personal data that is strictly necessary for the specific purposes of the AI application. Furthermore, the GDPR emphasizes the importance of data accuracy, ensuring that the data used to train and operate AI systems is correct and up-to-date. These foundational principles must guide every stage of AI implementation in HR to ensure adherence to GDPR requirements.
Legal Bases for Processing Employee Data
Navigating the legal bases for processing employee data when using AI can be complex, particularly concerning the use of consent. While consent is one of the lawful grounds for processing personal data under GDPR, its validity in the employment context is often scrutinized due to the inherent power imbalance between employers and employees. For consent to be valid, it must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. Given the potential for perceived pressure within an employment relationship, relying solely on consent as the legal basis for AI-driven HR processes involving employee data can be problematic. Therefore, HR departments should carefully explore alternative legal bases such as processing necessary for the performance of a contract (e.g., using AI for payroll or essential workflow organization) or processing based on the legitimate interests of the employer. However, when relying on legitimate interests, a strict balancing test must be conducted to ensure that the employer’s interests do not override the fundamental rights and freedoms of the employees.
Automated Decision-Making
Article 22 of the GDPR grants individuals the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them. This provision has significant implications for HR processes that involve AI-driven decision-making, particularly in areas such as hiring and terminations. Fully automated decision-making in these critical areas is generally restricted unless specific exceptions apply, such as explicit consent or authorization by law with suitable safeguards. To comply with Article 22, HR departments using AI for decision-making must implement appropriate safeguards, including ensuring human intervention in the decision-making process, providing individuals with the right to express their point of view, and offering a mechanism for them to contest automated decisions.
Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
When deploying AI systems that process personal data, particularly those classified as high-risk under the AI Act, HR departments are obligated to conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA). A DPIA is a process designed to identify and assess potential risks to the rights and freedoms of individuals that may arise from processing their personal data. This assessment helps organizations to understand the potential data protection implications of their AI systems and to implement appropriate measures to mitigate any identified risks. Notably, the AI Act requires that when conducting a DPIA for a high-risk AI system, deployers (such as HR departments) must use the information that the provider of the AI system is required to provide under the AI Act. This ensures a comprehensive and informed risk assessment.
Data Security and Governance
Finally, ensuring robust data security and implementing effective data governance measures are paramount for GDPR compliance when using AI in HR. HR departments must implement strong technical and organizational security measures to protect employee data from unauthorized access, processing, or loss. This includes measures such as encryption, access controls, and regular security audits. Furthermore, establishing clear data governance procedures is essential to ensure the quality, representativeness, and timeliness of the data used by AI systems. Adhering to the principle of data minimization by only collecting and retaining data that is necessary for the specific purposes of the AI application is also a crucial aspect of GDPR compliance.
The Growth Trajectory of AI in European Human Resources
The adoption of AI in HR across Europe is not a futuristic concept but a rapidly evolving reality, as evidenced by current statistics and emerging trends. Recent surveys indicate a significant upswing in AI usage among HR professionals. A substantial proportion of European companies have already integrated AI into at least one HR function, with figures suggesting that nearly three in four employers are leveraging AI in their HR operations. This indicates a transition from initial exploration to a more embedded utilization of AI technologies within HR departments. However, the rate of adoption varies across different European nations, with countries in the Nordic and continental regions generally demonstrating higher levels of AI integration compared to Southern and Southwestern Europe.
Looking ahead, the role of AI in European HR is projected to grow even more significantly, becoming a fundamental component of HR transformation and talent management strategies. Experts anticipate a continued increase in AI usage across the HR sector, with the potential for substantial automation of routine and administrative tasks. This evolution suggests a future where AI plays a more strategic and central role in how HR functions are executed and managed.
Current Applications of AI in HR
Currently, AI is delivering considerable value across a diverse range of HR functions:
- Recruitment and Candidate Screening: AI tools automate resume analysis, identify ideal candidates based on predefined criteria, and streamline the overall talent acquisition process.
- Employee Onboarding: AI-driven processes personalize orientation programs and provide tailored training modules for new hires.
- Performance Management and Feedback: AI enables continuous monitoring, provides real-time feedback based on objective data, and can even predict performance trends.
- Employee Development and Training: AI-driven learning platforms assess skills and preferences to deliver personalized training programs.
- Employee Engagement: AI analyzes sentiment in employee engagement surveys, providing valuable insights into employee satisfaction and areas for improvement.
- Workforce Planning and Predictive Analytics: AI helps organizations forecast future workforce needs by analyzing historical data and market trends.
- Talent Management: AI systems assist in identifying and nurturing talent within the organization, supporting decisions about promotions and career paths.
- Compensation and Benefits Analysis: AI optimizes compensation and benefits analysis by analyzing market trends and employee performance data.
- HR Chatbots and Employee Self-Service Platforms: AI-powered platforms provide instant answers to employee queries and streamline access to HR information.
These successful applications demonstrate the broad utility of AI in enhancing efficiency, personalization, and data-driven decision-making within HR.
The Evolving HR Technology Landscape
The landscape of HR technology is undergoing a rapid transformation, with AI becoming an increasingly integrated component of many solutions. There is a growing availability of AI-powered HR technology platforms and tools designed to address various HR needs. This technological evolution is also driving a shift towards skills-based talent management, where AI plays a crucial role in identifying skills gaps and matching talent to opportunities based on their competencies rather than just job titles. Furthermore, there is a significant focus on leveraging AI to enhance the employee experience by providing more personalized and efficient HR services and support. This evolving landscape underscores the need for HR managers to stay informed about the latest advancements in AI-powered HR technology to effectively leverage its potential.
Strategic Investments for Compliant AI Implementation
To effectively implement AI in European HR while adhering to the requirements of the GDPR and the AI Act, HR managers need to make strategic investments in several key areas. These investments will not only facilitate the adoption of AI but also ensure compliance and promote ethical practices.
AI-Powered HR Technology Platforms and Tools
One crucial area for investment is in AI-powered HR technology platforms and tools. This includes selecting and investing in AI solutions that offer capabilities aligned with the organization’s HR needs, such as those for recruitment, performance management, learning and development, and employee engagement. However, the selection process must go beyond mere functionality. HR managers must prioritize vendors who demonstrate a strong commitment to regulatory compliance, particularly with the GDPR and the AI Act. This involves ensuring that the chosen platforms and tools have robust data protection measures in place, that their AI algorithms are as transparent and explainable as possible, and that the vendors provide adequate documentation and support to facilitate compliance efforts.
Training Programs for HR Professionals
Another essential investment is in comprehensive training programs for HR professionals. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into HR processes, it is vital that HR teams develop a solid understanding of the fundamentals of AI technology, the specific implications of the GDPR and the AI Act, and best practices for using AI tools responsibly and ethically. Training should cover topics such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency requirements, and the importance of human oversight. Equipping HR professionals with this knowledge will empower them to effectively oversee and manage AI systems, make informed decisions about their implementation, and ensure ongoing compliance with the evolving regulatory landscape.
Legal and Compliance Expertise
Given the complexity of the legal framework surrounding AI in HR, particularly the interplay between GDPR and the AI Act, investing in legal and compliance expertise is highly recommended. Engaging legal counsel or compliance experts specializing in European data protection and AI regulations can provide invaluable guidance in navigating these complex requirements. Their expertise can help ensure that AI implementations are legally sound, that potential risks are identified and mitigated proactively, and that the organization remains compliant with all relevant regulations, thereby minimizing the risk of penalties.
Data Security Infrastructure and Protocols
Finally, a critical area for investment is in robust data security infrastructure and protocols. AI systems in HR often process large volumes of sensitive employee and candidate data. Therefore, strengthening data security measures is paramount to protect this information from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction, and to comply with the security requirements of GDPR. This includes investing in technologies and processes such as data encryption, strict access controls, data loss prevention mechanisms, and regular security audits.
Due Diligence on AI Vendors
When selecting AI vendors, HR managers must exercise due diligence to ensure their compliance with European regulations. This involves choosing vendors with a strong track record of data protection and adherence to GDPR and the AI Act. It is also important to evaluate the transparency and explainability of their AI algorithms to ensure that the decision-making processes are understandable. Furthermore, vendors should provide comprehensive documentation and adequate support to assist HR departments in their compliance efforts. Conducting thorough due diligence on the vendor’s security practices is also crucial to safeguard sensitive employee data.
Navigating the Challenges and Risks of AI in HR
While AI offers numerous benefits for HR, its implementation also presents several challenges and risks that European HR managers need to address proactively. Ethical considerations, particularly the potential for bias in AI algorithms, are paramount. AI algorithms are trained on data, and if this data reflects existing societal or organizational biases, the AI system can perpetuate and even amplify these biases, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes in areas like recruitment and performance evaluation. HR departments must therefore implement measures to detect, prevent, and mitigate algorithmic bias, such as using diverse and representative training data and regularly auditing AI systems for fairness. Ensuring fairness and equity in all AI-driven decisions is a critical ethical responsibility.
Human Oversight
The need for human oversight and intervention in AI-driven decisions cannot be overstated. While AI can automate tasks and provide valuable insights, it should not entirely replace human judgment, especially in critical HR matters that significantly impact individuals’ careers. HR professionals must retain the ability to review, intervene, and adjust AI-generated decisions. Avoiding fully automated decision-making in sensitive areas like hiring and terminations is crucial for ensuring accountability and addressing unforeseen consequences.
Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
Ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency in all AI applications within HR is essential for building trust and maintaining ethical standards. HR departments must prioritize fairness in the design and deployment of AI systems, establish clear lines of accountability for the decisions these systems make, and maintain transparency about how they operate and arrive at their conclusions.
Managing Employee Trust
Managing employee trust and addressing potential concerns about job displacement and privacy are also significant challenges. The introduction of AI in the workplace can lead to employee resistance and a lack of trust if not handled properly. HR managers need to communicate clearly and transparently about the role of AI, its potential impact on job security, and the measures being taken to protect the privacy of employee data processed by these systems. Open communication and proactive engagement with employees are crucial for fostering trust and ensuring the successful adoption of AI in HR.
Best Practices for Responsible AI Adoption in European HR
To navigate the complexities of implementing AI in European HR while adhering to the GDPR and the AI Act, HR managers should adopt a set of best practices that promote responsible and ethical use of this technology.
Internal Policies and Guidelines
Developing clear internal policies and guidelines for AI usage is a fundamental step. These policies should establish guidelines for responsible AI use that align with ethical principles and regulatory requirements, define clear rules for how AI should be used in various HR processes, and ensure that all employees are aware of and understand these policies.
Ethical AI Implementation and Governance
Establishing a framework for ethical AI implementation and governance is also crucial. This involves prioritizing ethical considerations throughout the entire lifecycle of AI systems, potentially establishing an ethical review committee or assigning specific responsibility for ethical AI oversight, and conducting regular ethical impact assessments to evaluate the potential societal and human rights implications of AI applications in HR.
Continuous Monitoring and Auditing
Implementing continuous monitoring and auditing of AI systems is essential for ensuring their ongoing compliance and ethical performance. This includes regularly monitoring the performance and accuracy of AI algorithms, auditing AI systems for potential biases and discriminatory outcomes, and ensuring ongoing compliance with the GDPR and the AI Act.
Data Quality and Algorithmic Bias
Prioritizing data quality and addressing algorithmic bias proactively are also key best practices. This involves ensuring that the data used to train AI systems is relevant, representative, and free of errors and biases, implementing robust data governance procedures to maintain data quality, and utilizing techniques to detect and mitigate bias in algorithms.
Employee Involvement
Finally, fostering open communication and actively involving employees in the AI adoption process can build trust, reduce resistance, and lead to more successful implementations. This includes informing employees and their representatives about the use of AI in the workplace, providing opportunities for them to ask questions and voice concerns, and seeking their feedback on AI implementations.
Conclusion: Embracing AI in European HR with Confidence and Compliance
The integration of AI into European human resources presents a transformative opportunity to enhance efficiency, personalize employee experiences, and drive strategic talent management. However, navigating this technological advancement requires a thorough understanding of the European regulatory landscape, particularly the GDPR and the upcoming AI Act. HR managers must recognize the critical importance of aligning their AI initiatives with legal and ethical standards to foster trust among employees and ensure the long-term success of these implementations.
Key considerations for HR managers include carefully decoding the risk-based approach of the AI Act and understanding the specific obligations associated with prohibited and high-risk AI systems, most of which will encompass core HR functions. Ensuring ongoing compliance with GDPR principles, especially concerning the legal bases for processing data, the right to not be subject to solely automated decision-making, the necessity of conducting DPIAs, and the implementation of robust data security measures, is paramount. Strategic investments in compliant AI technology, comprehensive training for HR professionals, legal and compliance expertise, and a strong data security infrastructure are essential enablers for responsible AI adoption.
Furthermore, HR leaders must proactively address the inherent challenges and risks associated with AI, including the potential for algorithmic bias, the critical need for human oversight, and the importance of ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency. Open communication and active engagement with employees are crucial for building trust and mitigating concerns about job displacement and privacy.
By adhering to best practices such as developing clear internal policies, establishing ethical governance frameworks, implementing continuous monitoring and auditing, prioritizing data quality, and fostering open communication, European HR managers can confidently embrace the power of AI while upholding their legal and ethical obligations. Continuous learning, adaptation to evolving regulatory changes, and a human-centric approach to AI in HR will be key to realizing the full potential of this technology in shaping the future of work in Europe.
References
- AI in HR Management: How Does It Mesh with European AI Regulation? – Deel, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.deel.com/blog/ai-in-hr-management-and-european-regulation/
- Benefits of AI for Certified HR Professionals | UTSA PaCE, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.utsa.edu/pace/news/benefits-of-ai-for-certified-hr-professionals.html
- AI for HR: The future of human resources – SAP, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.sap.com/resources/ai-for-hr
- Top 6 Benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in HR | ClearCompany, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.clearcompany.com/top-benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-hr
- AI & Human Resources: Opportunities & Challenges – Leapsome, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.leapsome.com/blog/ai-and-human-resources
- AI in HR: Applications, Benefits, and Examples | Workday US, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.workday.com/en-us/topics/ai/ai-in-hr.html
- Using AI in HR: How Artificial Intelligence Has Significantly Improved HR and Human Resource Management | Moveworks, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.moveworks.com/us/en/resources/blog/how-ai-has-changed-hr-for-the-better
- AI adoption among HR professionals rises to 72% – Staffing Industry Analysts, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.staffingindustry.com/news/global-daily-news/ai-adoption-among-hr-professionals-rises-to-72
- How the EU AI Act Will Shape People Analytics in the Workplace – Diversio, accessed April 4, 2025, https://diversio.com/eu-ai-act-people-analytics-in-the-workplace/
- Nearly 3 in 4 European employers using AI in HR function – but risks a concern: survey, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.hcamag.com/us/specialization/hr-technology/nearly-3-in-4-european-employers-using-ai-in-hr-function-but-risks-a-concern-survey/509325
- AI and Employee Data Protection in the European Union: 8 Key Takeaways for Multinational Businesses | Fisher Phillips, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/ai-employee-data-protection-european-union-takeaways-for-multinational-businesses.html
- AI and HR – Navigating legal obligations in Europe – datenschutz notizen, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.datenschutz-notizen.de/ai-and-hr-navigating-legal-obligations-in-europe-0548541/
- AI in Recruitment: Balancing Innovation with GDPR Compliance, accessed April 4, 2025, https://gdprlocal.com/ai-in-recruitment-balancing-innovation-with-gdpr-compliance/
- The Impact of the EU AI Act on Human Resources Activities – Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.hunton.com/insights/legal/the-impact-of-the-eu-ai-act-on-human-resources-activities
- AI and employment law: what the AI Act means for HR – KPMG-Law, accessed April 4, 2025, https://kpmg-law.de/en/ai-and-employment-law-what-the-ai-act-means-for-hr/
- WHAT DOES THE EU AI ACT MEAN FOR EMPLOYERS? | Clifford Chance, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2024/08/what-does-the-eu-ai-act-mean-for-employers.pdf
- What the EU AI Act means for HR – Mercer, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.mercer.com/insights/people-strategy/future-of-work/what-the-eu-ai-act-means-for-hr/
- HR and the GDPR: keeping your HR technology compliant – HRMS World, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.hrmsworld.com/hr-technology-and-gdpr.html
- GDPR for Human Resources: What to Know for Employee Data – Redactable, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.redactable.com/blog/gdpr-for-human-resources-what-to-know-for-employee-data
- AI Act: high-risk AI systems – what applies, what is due when? – Taylor Wessing, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.taylorwessing.com/en/insights-and-events/insights/2024/11/high-risk-ai-systems
- Need for action when using AI systems in HR, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.simmons-simmons.com/en/publications/cm8x4qexp0092ulocorhp4fqg/need-for-action-when-using-ai-systems-in-hr
- The EU AI Act as a game-changer for HR and staffing companies | by Reshaping Work, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@reshaping_work/the-eu-ai-act-as-a-game-changer-for-hr-and-staffing-companies-99aa3be1f2de
- AI & the Workplace: Navigating Prohibited AI Practices in the EU – Bird & Bird, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2025/global/ai-and-the-workplace-navigating-prohibited-ai-practices-in-the-eu
- Understanding the EU AI Act’s Prohibited Practices: Key Workplace and Advertising Insights from the new Draft Guidelines – Lewis Silkin LLP, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.lewissilkin.com/insights/2025/02/17/understanding-the-eu-ai-acts-prohibited-practices-key-workplace-and-advertising-102k011
- Commission publishes the Guidelines on prohibited artificial intelligence (AI) practices, as defined by the AI Act. | Shaping Europe’s digital future – European Union, accessed April 4, 2025, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-prohibited-artificial-intelligence-ai-practices-defined-ai-act
- AI Act: Prohibited AI Practices Become Applicable | EY – Greece, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.ey.com/en_gr/technical/tax/tax-alerts/ai-act-prohibited-ai-practices-become-applicable
- Article 6: Classification Rules for High-Risk AI Systems | EU Artificial Intelligence Act, accessed April 4, 2025, https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/6/
- AI and Employee Data Protection in the European Union: 8 Key Takeaways for Multinational Businesses | Fisher Phillips – JD Supra, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/ai-and-employee-data-protection-in-the-3277977/
- Europe – the AI revolution is underway but not quite yet in HR?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.employmentlawworldview.com/europe-the-ai-revolution-is-underway-but-not-quite-yet-in-hr/
- Developing a Global Data Protection Framework for Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/developing-global-data-protection-framework-artificial-intelligence
- Legal requirements for AI in human resources | Simpliant Insights, accessed April 4, 2025, https://simpliant.eu/insights/legal-requirements-for-ai-in-human-resources
- What is automated individual decision-making and profiling? | ICO, accessed April 4, 2025, https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/automated-decision-making-and-profiling/what-is-automated-individual-decision-making-and-profiling/
- Art. 22 GDPR – Automated individual decision-making, including profiling – General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), accessed April 4, 2025, https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/
- Automated decision-making or automated decision-execution? – IAPP, accessed April 4, 2025, https://iapp.org/news/a/automated-decision-making-or-automated-decision-execution-
- Are there restrictions on the use of automated decision-making? – European Commission, accessed April 4, 2025, https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/rules-business-and-organisations/dealing-citizens/are-there-restrictions-use-automated-decision-making_en
- Usage of AI technologies increasing in EU enterprises – News articles – Eurostat, accessed April 4, 2025, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250123-3
- The great AI-in-HR balancing act: Finding your organization’s way – HR Executive, accessed April 4, 2025, https://hrexecutive.com/the-great-ai-in-hr-balancing-act-finding-your-organizations-way/
- Generative AI Takes Center Stage at HR Tech Europe 2025, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.hrtechnologyeurope.com/news-insights/generative-ai-takes-center-stage-hr-tech-europe-2025
- A new future of work: The race to deploy AI and raise skills in Europe and beyond – McKinsey & Company, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/a-new-future-of-work-the-race-to-deploy-ai-and-raise-skills-in-europe-and-beyond
- The Future of AI for Talent Management: Shifting Perspectives to Drive Potential – SAP News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.sap.com/2025/03/ai-talent-management-shifting-perspectives-drive-potential/
- Europe’s AI Future Depends On Business Leaders, Not Just Policymakers – Forbes, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesagencycouncil/2025/03/06/europes-ai-future-depends-on-business-leaders-not-just-policymakers/
- How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Human Resources and the Workforce – Aon, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.aon.com/en/insights/articles/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-human-resources-and-the-workforce
- AI in HR: How AI Is Transforming the Future of HR | Gartner, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.gartner.com/en/human-resources/topics/artificial-intelligence-in-hr
- The Benefits and Challenges of Using AI in Human Resources – Nelson Connects, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.nelsonconnects.com/learning-center/blogs/the-benefits-and-challenges-of-using-ai-in-human-resources
- The Impact of AI on Human Resources: Opportunities and Challenges – Mondo, accessed April 4, 2025, https://mondo.com/insights/impact-of-ai-on-human-resources-opportunities-and-challenges/
- Expert Advice on How to Ethically Implement AI in HR – Senior Executive, accessed April 4, 2025, https://seniorexecutive.com/ethical-ai-implementation-in-hr-best-practices/
Artificial Intelligence and the future of work – February 2025 – – Eurobarometer survey, accessed April 4, 2025, https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3222